An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws

An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws

Blog Article

9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair for the offender as well as the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a good amount of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

The main objectives of police is always to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and higher than all make sure regulation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more

Given that the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be attained, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of your Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances on the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 with the Constitution. Read more

184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the moment case, the guidelines as established forth would not implement, given that the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, fairly he has been acquitted in the criminal charges based on evidence and it truly is very well-settled law that once the civil servant is acquitted inside the criminal case, then on this very charge he cannot be awarded in any punishment via the department and held him disqualified for the post because acquittal for all long term purposes. The aforesaid proposition has been set at naught with the Supreme Court of Pakistan while in the case with the District Police Officer Mainwali and a pair of others v.

These past decisions are called "case legislation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Enable the decision stand"—would be the principle by which judges are bound to such past decisions, drawing on proven judicial authority to formulate their positions.

All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in help of the Supreme Court, making sure the enforcement of its judgments. Since the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been arrived at, the decision in the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) in the Constitution. Read more

168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Topic: Appeal At times it can be hassle-free for a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation for making an read more attempt to get rid of a case on merit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's reached to a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for advantage disposal when it's reached these types of stage. Read more

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, It is usually a properly-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is topic on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle proven by a court, which other courts are obligated to adhere to.

In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative from the regulation laid down with the Supreme Court while in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. So, the competent authority of the parent department with the petitioner and also the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount with the petitioner and spend the pension amount and other ancillary benefits on the petitioner to which He's entitled under the law within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority from the respondent is also directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of your petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more

The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information for being gathered through the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.

Ordinarily, only an appeal accepted via the court of very last vacation resort will resolve this sort of differences and, For most reasons, such appeals are often not granted.

Criminal cases From the common regulation tradition, courts decide the law applicable into a case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Unlike most civil law systems, common legislation systems Adhere to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their individual previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all reduce courts should make decisions consistent with the previous decisions of higher courts.